Probably with a slight advantage in favor of the first. Let's see together why. It's true: a mobile site can be optimized with specific keywords designed for mobile users. But it's also true that, being the risk is to run into content duplication.
A practice that Google doesn't appreciate much and that could penalize your positioning on search engines. Can you avoid being punished? Yes, by using small SEO tricks. For example, by using the Rel Alternate and Rel Canonical tags you can help Google understand that it is not a duplication, but rather a classic version of an “official” site and a series of mobile sites with evidently similar content.
A non-existent problem in the case chinese overseas australia phone number list of a responsive website. With a single URL, there is no risk of duplicate content (unless you have copied your texts from other sources on the web) and positioning actions (such as actions aimed at link earning), are guided towards a single web address.
This means concentrating your efforts towards a single goal and, with a high probability, reaching it sooner. Is this why Google, just a few months ago, wrote on its blog that the responsive technique is the best way to develop a website in terms of optimization? 5.
A website totally independent from the desktop one
-
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2024 8:54 am