Pavel Katkov, founder of the law firm Future Legal

Unite professionals to advance email dataset knowledge globally.
Post Reply
tanjimajuha20
Posts: 540
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2025 7:18 am

Pavel Katkov, founder of the law firm Future Legal

Post by tanjimajuha20 »

a Stepanova shared her concerns with ComNews: "A subcontractor in such projects is very vulnerable, and if the contractor has bad intentions, it is difficult for him to get back the money invested." According to ComNews, another subcontractor of Tekhstroy found itself in the same situation (although the amount of debt to it is smaller), and now this company is considering whether to file a lawsuit against the debtor, following the example of Atlant.

A source familiar with the bangladesh whatsapp number databa se situation told ComNews that Neoleks Group of Companies has other subcontractors who do not have signed documents from it about the work performed - these companies will hardly be able to receive money from Tekhstroy and other companies in the group for the work performed.

, commented for ComNews on the prospect of lawsuits from the Neoleks group of companies against Miranda: "The defendant does not deny that the contracts took place and claims that he is not satisfied with the results of the work and the deadlines for their completion. Accordingly, two things will be important in court. The first is whether the quality really does not correspond to the contract. The second is how the deadlines were specified. And one more thing: whether there were any counter-violations on the part of the customer. Depending on this, the court will make a decision."

Pavel Katkov added that from the point of view of assessing the good faith of Miranda, the court will take into account its proposal to replace the contractor. "The Civil Code of the Russian Federation really gives the customer such an opportunity. However, the main document remains the contract - it, as well as the behavior of the parties within its framework, the court will evaluate first of all," the founder of Future Legal concluded.

"We need to look at the legal documents. They should have deadlines: if the contractors fail to meet the deadlines, then there are penalties. Perhaps they were not satisfied with the compensation that Miranda was ready to pay them for the work already done, or they wanted to get everything to the end, but again, the question is about the conditions for failure to meet deadlines," says Denis Kuskov, CEO of Telecom Daily LLC. "It happens that a cellular operator works on base stations that have not been put into operation. This is no secret, there is nothing wrong with this, now in this area there is a notification nature. I think that the court will side with those who have more verified legal aspects of the activity, spelled out in the contract."

"If we talk about the legalization of new base stations, it is an open secret that many base stations start working, and the documents for them appear later. This has happened historically. Delays reach up to a month, a month and a half, two. There are no problems with base stations, but the permitting documentation appears much later. Everyone turns a blind eye to this, that is, in fact, all participants in the process understand the situation. I do not recall lawsuits for the fact that base stations were not delivered on time," said Eldar Murtazin, leading analyst at Mobile Research Group LLC.

ComNews Dossier
Post Reply