The problem is that many organizations

[rakhirhif8963]

In the past, the focus was on code vulnerabilities and access to it, but in the era of microservices, distributed systems and online data processing, the focus will be on securing communication channels - especially in relation to the new model of work. We should expect an increased focus on inter-process security and more secure communications between applications. We must learn to trust information at the source, ensuring that this information is reaching the right people, the data is secure and access to it is properly authenticated and authorized.

are using databases that were created over 30 years ago. Developing new versions of these databases in a closed-source environment often means that existing versions must continue to work, leaving the france mobile database with technical debt. This can leave data unprotected, opening the door to bugs and security breaches. If 30-year-old technology doesn’t evolve, you end up with a clunky, confusing system.

This is where open source database technologies like Postgres excel. The community is interested in building strong systems and isn't afraid to change things that don't work as well as they did in the past.

While there are still misconceptions about Open Source technology, there are also challenges associated with closed source databases. For example, companies often have to spend more to maintain these databases than they would on an open source alternative. Organizations’ desire for Open Source is to not be held back by features that don’t justify their cost. Open source allows them to secure databases to enable hyper-personalization of clusters, ensuring that the entire database is not open to vulnerabilities.