zyxel-nwa130be
Zyxel NWA130BE – Multi-Client Stress Test using 5 client devices – (10MB files)+heavy browsing (5GHz 80MHz).
Clients handling download traffic showed poor latency, especially one that hovered between 16 and 17 seconds. Its performance was very similar to the U7 Pro, although I would say 4K streaming latency was slightly better on the Zyxel AP. Is 300ms better than 400ms? Yes. Does it matter? Not much, because you’ll still be in trouble. By the way, the total throughput of download clients was 611.4 Mbps.
zyxel-nwa130be
Zyxel NWA130BE – Multi-Client Stress Test using 5 canada telegram data client devices – Simultaneous 4K streaming and downloading (10MB files)+heavy browsing (5GHz 80MHz).
Let's keep things a little simpler and use one client for download traffic, two for 4K streaming, and the last two for heavy browsing. And this is where things got really interesting, because the loading latency stayed below 200ms 75% of the time and only went above 300ms 1% of the time. That's a lot better than what we saw on the U7 Pro.
The two 4K streaming clients struggled to keep latency below 150ms 75% of the time, but eventually gave up, and we see values above 200ms 1% of the time. The intense viewing latency was within acceptable limits. The downloading client had a total throughput of 399.1 Mbps, so the access point controlled it despite not having any limits set for it.