How to combat redundant content when reviewing web content
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2024 5:47 am
It's easy to spot when a piece of writing is made up of empty sentences that say nothing. That's a terrible practice for someone who creates content for the Internet! Find out how to identify and combat it here.
In an increasingly competitive market, it is necessary to look for assertive, effective and successful solutions to solve problems, isn't it? That is why it is essential that accumulated experiences show that the start of the activity helps in the preparation and involvement of everything else.
Thus, it is necessary to aim and choose those that are appropriate for each situation – in the end, each case is a different case.
Did you understand anything? Do you want to try to reread the filipina telegram introduction again? I warn you: you won't understand!
These paragraphs were intended to be about talking, talking, and saying nothing. Still, are they well written? Yes! But do they convey a relevant idea? No!
Therefore, it is necessary to pay attention when revising a text that gives the impression of being well suited to the guideline. To help you revise texts with that intention, we created a content with some practical tips to deliver quality work. Shall we begin?
1. Identify “empty” pieces of text
The first step to avoid irrelevant texts reaching the client is to identify parts that add nothing to the content. Common sense phrases, generalizations, adjective-filled periods, and texts with many rhetorical questions can all be used together to extend a content without getting it anywhere. Want some examples? Then take a look:
Common sense: “In an increasingly competitive market, […]”;
Generalizations: “Everyone knows that […]”;
Excessive adjectives: “This method is objective, clear, direct and effective.”;
Rhetorical questions: “You know what I'm talking about, don't you?”
Of course, these structures are not prohibited, but they must be used appropriately. And it is your job as a reviewer to evaluate what contributes meaning and content to the text and what does not.
2. Do research on the topic addressed
After seeing that the content has some weaknesses that make it weaker, you need to adapt those parts and the only way to do this is by understanding what is relevant and, therefore, should be included. Therefore, it is ideal that you research some texts that deal with issues related to the topic.
As the work of Review here at Rock is collaborative, it is necessary to understand that the final result is the conjunction of the skills of all those involved. Thus, you also become responsible for the quality of the content delivered to the client.
In an increasingly competitive market, it is necessary to look for assertive, effective and successful solutions to solve problems, isn't it? That is why it is essential that accumulated experiences show that the start of the activity helps in the preparation and involvement of everything else.
Thus, it is necessary to aim and choose those that are appropriate for each situation – in the end, each case is a different case.
Did you understand anything? Do you want to try to reread the filipina telegram introduction again? I warn you: you won't understand!
These paragraphs were intended to be about talking, talking, and saying nothing. Still, are they well written? Yes! But do they convey a relevant idea? No!
Therefore, it is necessary to pay attention when revising a text that gives the impression of being well suited to the guideline. To help you revise texts with that intention, we created a content with some practical tips to deliver quality work. Shall we begin?
1. Identify “empty” pieces of text
The first step to avoid irrelevant texts reaching the client is to identify parts that add nothing to the content. Common sense phrases, generalizations, adjective-filled periods, and texts with many rhetorical questions can all be used together to extend a content without getting it anywhere. Want some examples? Then take a look:
Common sense: “In an increasingly competitive market, […]”;
Generalizations: “Everyone knows that […]”;
Excessive adjectives: “This method is objective, clear, direct and effective.”;
Rhetorical questions: “You know what I'm talking about, don't you?”
Of course, these structures are not prohibited, but they must be used appropriately. And it is your job as a reviewer to evaluate what contributes meaning and content to the text and what does not.
2. Do research on the topic addressed
After seeing that the content has some weaknesses that make it weaker, you need to adapt those parts and the only way to do this is by understanding what is relevant and, therefore, should be included. Therefore, it is ideal that you research some texts that deal with issues related to the topic.
As the work of Review here at Rock is collaborative, it is necessary to understand that the final result is the conjunction of the skills of all those involved. Thus, you also become responsible for the quality of the content delivered to the client.