IRS employees are not held fully accountable

[samiaseo222]

prove that Davis assaulted Nicholson and hospital reports prove that Nicholson sustained injuries as a result of the assault. Despite a complaint lodged by Nicholson with Las Vegas police October 8 , the state refuses to file criminal assault charges against Davis.

Davis' actions are also in direct violation of IRS regulations, but no administrative action against Davis has been taken by the tax collection agency.

According to the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 under Section 1203, Termination of Employment for Misconduct, “...IRS employees must be charged with misconduct and terminated if there has been a judicial or final administrative determination that the employee committed any of the following acts or ommissions....with respect to job function email list assault or battery; violations of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986...for the purpose of retaliating against, or harassing, a taxpayer, a taxpayer representative or other employee of the Internal Revenue Service.”

The IRS explains that, “This new provision was enacted in response to the widespread perception that for improper conduct affecting taxpayers.”

Apparently the new provision, which was adopted in the wake of publicly aired IRS abuse hearings held all over the country in 1998, is only triggered after an official determination of misconduct. If evidence of such misconduct does not result in a criminal conviction and the IRS refuses to review the evidence of misconduct and make an administrative ruling, the employee is not subject to the provision. Public perception that IRS employees are not accountable for improper conduct toward taxpayers is still correct.