The security benefits of this network approach are obvious, but it requires a lot of work on the network infrastructure to establish access control for each segment. To achieve segmentation, the initial implementation of Zero Trust requires rebuilding the entire network infrastructure. Since most enterprises have a complex information infrastructure that includes on-premises and cloud resources, deploying Zero Trust network security requires a lot of work.
Zero level is based on the premise that hackers cannot be allowed into a network segment, but if they manage to bypass the security controls of a particular segment, they can easily compromise or gain control of another one on the same network. An approach that secures each individual resource, rather than just the segment gateway, is more in line with the defense-in-depth concept and would be a much better choice.
Zero Trust based on identity
Now consider identity-based Zero Trust, which pushes kenya mobile database to the identity layer rather than the network layer. In this architecture, authentication is applied to the user’s identity, rather than to their connection as in network-based Zero Trust. According to NIST guidance , identity-based Zero Trust is a good approach for enterprises using cloud applications and services that do not allow customers to bring their own security.
For example, in a Zero Trust network, an authenticated VPN user is trusted and inherently has the right to access resources such as file servers or databases in the environment. In an identity-based approach, an authenticated VPN user is not automatically “trusted” and must authenticate each time they attempt to access a resource. This is similar to a bartender checking an ID every time a customer orders a drink, even though they have already presented one to get into the club.