I suppose that's partly due to the limits that you have clearly

[nishat@264]

Well, you obviously have to be committed to making it work, but you also have to be able to deliver software that's more than just a gimmick. A lot of the tools that were out there when we started weren't very user-friendly or weren't designed with a particular workflow in mind. We really try to differentiate ourselves by delivering software that takes into account how we use those tools. That's how we've really differentiated ourselves and built a huge following and a large customer base that uses our products every day. I think it's that commitment to making the product work and watching and listening to how it's being used that's allowed us to grow from a few hundred users in the first year to over 60,000 today.

Jeroen:

That's great. And all this without really tongliao cell phone number list upsetting LinkedIn.established in the software. With numerous warnings when a user wants to exceed them. Is that the main reason why LinkedIn has not decided to ban you?

The will:

Fortunately, it's not really LinkedIn's place to ban us. We've taken a lot of measures in Dux-Soup on the one hand. Measures to make sure that the bot's work rate is within what is humanly possible, because obviously a bot could send a hundred messages in an hour. But it's not something you wouldn't do. Our goal is always to build something that automates the human process, without abusing LinkedIn's generosity to the point of upsetting them. On the other hand, it's also because we built it from the ground up and we looked at the technical measures to avoid any technical detection from LinkedIn. We've worked on both of those aspects.

Jeroen:

I understand. If I'm not mistaken, you started Dux-Soup because you wanted to help your wife with one of her projects. Is that correct?