Dynamic rendering — Here, normal browsers get

[kexej28769@nongnue]

So, what are our options? Let's break down the concept of server-served content a bit and explore our options. Here are the high-level methods that Google outlined at the aforementioned I/O conference:


A a 'standard' web app that requires client-side rendering while bots (like Google Bot and social media services) are served with static snapshots. This involves adding an extra step to your server brazil number data , namely a service that fetches your web app, renders the content, then returns that static HTML to the bots based on their user agent (i.e. UA sniffing). Historically this was done with a service like PhantomJS (now deprecated and no longer being developed), while today Puppeteer (headless Chrome) can perform a similar task. The main advantage is that it can often be rolled into your existing infrastructure .

Hybrid Rendering - This is Google's long-standing recommendation, and it's the way to build a brand new site. In short, everyone — bots and humans — gets an initial view rendered as fully rendered static HTML. Crawlers can then continue to request the URL and get static content every time, whereas on normal browsers, JavaScript takes over after the initial page loads. This ایک عظیم حل ہےin theory، اور رفتار اور استعمال کے لیے بہت سے دوسرے فوائد کے ساتھ آتا ہے۔ اس پر جلد ہی مزید۔
The latter is cleaner, doesn't involve UA sniffing, and is Google's long-term recommendation. It's also worth clarifying that 'hybrid rendering' is not a single solution - it's the result of many possible ways to make static pre-rendered content available server-side. Let's break down how such a result can be achieved.