. Individual keyword clicks

[kexej28769@nongnue]

website and individual keyword fluctuations don't get much use. It would take too long to look at and I would probably ignore it.
Can this information be better divided or grouped to improve performance?
Yes, absolutely. If we group it by page type or topic level, it becomes much more interesting. Knowing that my traffic has dropped for just one topic will force me to try to push more resources and get us back to parity. We would also ideally like to see the difference in rankings with and without features.
How long will it take me to include this information in the report?
There are plenty of rank trackers with austria number data this data. The integration may take some time, but the data is there.
Is this information to rule something out or to help me make a decision?
We're just looking at performance here in general, so that's helping me weigh in on my decision.
Conclusion: Yes, we should include keyword rankings, but they should be grouped and ideally ranked both with and without Google features. We would also want to avoid average rankings, so as to lose the subtlety in how our keywords are moving between each other. This example graph from STAT illustrates this well:





معلومات کے اس ٹکڑے کی وجہ سے میرے ذہن کو تبدیل کرنے میں کیا مشکلات ہیں؟
Less specifically since it won't compensate for weather conditions, I'd definitely find myself relying more on the ratings here.
کیا اس معلومات کو بہتر بنانے کے لیے بہتر طور پر تقسیم یا گروپ کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
Again yes, as above. This will almost certainly need to be grouped.
مجھے اس معلومات کو رپورٹ میں شامل کرنے میں کتنا وقت لگے گا؟
It will have to come from Search Console. Once again, it will be time for integration, but the data is there.