This objective presents some clear goals in the work to combat corruption, such as:
16.3: Promote the rule of law, at national and international levels, and ensure equal access to justice for all;
16.4: Significantly reduce illicit financial and arms flows, strengthen the recovery and return of stolen resources and combat all forms of organized crime;
16.5: Substantially reduce corruption and bribery in all their forms;
16.6: Develop effective, accountable and transparent institutions at all levels;
16.7: Ensure responsive, inclusive, participatory and representative decision-making at all levels;
16.10: Ensure public access to information and protect latvia mobile database fundamental freedoms, in accordance with national legislation and international agreements.
There is no way to implement plans to combat corruption without first thinking about strengthening transparency in politics. And for the environment to be more transparent, the engagement and participation of civil society in decision-making processes is essential. What makes it very difficult for citizens to collaborate more in debates is the limited education and understanding of the political and legislative scenario. As a result, a large portion of the population ends up accepting that there is no way to make significant changes.
This acceptance that changes in the scenario are not possible means that politics is increasingly seen as a dirty and criminal element, a fact that leads to people becoming distanced from government-related matters. In this sense, the role of institutional and government relations professionals is absolutely necessary to facilitate dialogue between public and private interests, in addition to being key players in translating government data that form the basis of legislative processes.
Advocacy is also a very important tool for disseminating a culture of greater political transparency and, consequently, in the fight against corruption. This is because its practice allows civil society entities to act in defense of common issues in society, before public authorities, to exercise their power of influence over decision-making, in order to achieve positive results for citizens' demands.
Finally, the more careful private companies are about being compliant, the greater the chances of avoiding regulatory risks and potential crises caused by misconduct by internal employees. In this context, combining the actions of the RIG department with compliance is also a way of preventing corrupt actions from being implemented in the day-to-day business that moves the country.